I have lost count of the
amount of times I have seen bids that do not have a coherent style throughout
the bid. Although to some people it may
not seem important, I cannot stress enough how having a clearly presented bid
makes a difference for an evaluator.
The first thing to do on
style, is agree as a project team what your style will be for the bid; this
includes font type, font size (including for headings and sub-headings), colour
schemes, line spacing and how you will present case studies and examples
(amongst other things). This forms a
style guide for all those working on the bid to follow. I would also recommend that the style is
followed throughout the bid, not just applied at the end; this hopefully avoids
inconsistencies due to a lack of time before submitting.
I would recommend, for the
public sector in particularly, that the style is kept as simple and clear as
possible. The objective is both to be eye-catching and make the bid easy to
read; too many colours and pictures can end up being a detriment to what you
are actually trying to say. Although
this is probably blasphemy, do not be hamstrung by any brand guidelines;
winning a bid is more important than following brand guidelines to the letter.
Different styles work for
different organisations and for who you are pitching your bid to. The style
that has ended up working best for me has been:
·
Arial
Font
·
Size
14 for headings, 12 for sub-headings and 11 for main text
·
1.5
line spacing and no extra gaps before or after paragraphs
·
Colour
boxes for case studies
·
Use
of PowerPoints for shorter examples or those involving pictures
No comments:
Post a Comment